Claiming Video Was "Deepfake" Not Enough to Require Excluding It, Even Absent Evidence of Who Recorded It
LawCriminal LawCommunications
THE AI ANGLE
Serving as an unproven defense claim of evidence fabricationThe Iowa Supreme Court ruled that a video of sexual abuse was properly admitted through circumstantial evidence without chain-of-custody proof. The court rejected the defendant's argument that the recording was an artificial intelligence deepfake. Criminal law practitioners must now offer concrete evidence of tampering rather than general claims about technology.
THE TEACHING ANGLE
Students can evaluate whether recognizing personal physical details is enough to prove a video is authentic when deepfakes exist.Read the original at reason.com Generate teaching or study materials
More in Law
- The eyes have it: Reform politician’s ‘smart glasses’ prompt calls for ban in WestminsterThe Guardian — Technology · October 14, 2026
- How long will humans be needed for translation?BBC — Technology · October 14, 2026
- AFL tells Sportsbet to stop using players in AI-generated contentThe Guardian — Technology · October 14, 2026
- Companies may be held liable when AI harms their clients and customersThe Conversation — AI · October 14, 2026
- In a first, AI helps UK lawmaker find her voice in ParliamentPhys.org — Technology · October 14, 2026