Humans or AI? Who or what can scam you more effectively?
PsychologyCybersecurityCommunications
THE AI ANGLE
Automating and scaling personalized spear-phishing messagesBrigham Young University researchers found that AI-generated spear-phishing messages deceived recipients 28% of the time compared to 21% for human-authored scams, matching or outperforming humans in generating clicks 80% of the time. The study revealed that incorporating personalized details like workplace roles and co-worker names significantly boosts credibility, while recipients correctly identified AI authorship only 52% of the time. This shift demonstrates how AI can rapidly scale highly persuasive social engineering attacks using publicly available information, undermining traditional content-based scam recognition.
THE TEACHING ANGLE
Instructors can examine how psychological reliance on familiarity and interpersonal cues creates vulnerabilities that make automated, highly personalized spear-phishing difficult to detect through message content alone.Read the original at phys.org Generate teaching or study materials
More in Psychology
- Secure Messaging and AI Remain In Conflict Despite the Promise of TEEsEFF Deeplinks · September 19, 2026
- US government website used Chinese model the FBI called "malicious"Ars Technica · September 19, 2026
- Claude couldn’t hack OpenAI. Then Anthropic shipped Opus 5.The New Stack · September 19, 2026
- FBI: Fake cop and government impersonation scams cost victims $1.6BThe Register · September 19, 2026
- AI and GhostwritingThe Volokh Conspiracy · September 19, 2026