Liability and Pricing of Dual-Use AI -- by Joshua S. Gans
EconomicsLaw
THE AI ANGLE
Serving as a shared input for cyberattacks, security defense, and productive workA research paper models legal liability for artificial intelligence systems used by attackers, defenders, and productive businesses. It shows that holding providers liable raises prices and dampens attack efforts, but compensating victims also weakens defense. These findings indicate that full liability is rarely optimal when regulators want to preserve access for productive users.
THE TEACHING ANGLE
Students can examine whether compensating cyberattack victims undermines their incentive to defend themselves.Read the original at nber.org Generate teaching or study materials
More in Economics
- South Korea’s AI chip giants are fighting for a bigger role in America’s AI boomRest of World · September 28, 2026
- New Report Finds More Lawyers Use AI, But For What Tasks?Above the Law · September 28, 2026
- The US government plans to use AI to help redact documentsEngadget · September 28, 2026
- An LLM Workflow That Reproduces, Improves, and Extends Published Economics Research -- by Matthew Schwartz, Isaiah Andrews, Jesse M. ShapiroNBER Working Papers · September 28, 2026
- Jensen Huang says AI distillation is 'competition.' Scott Bessent has called it 'theft'CNBC — Technology · September 28, 2026