To end 'whack-a-mole' war on AI deepfakes, address the 'ecosystem,' researchers urge
LawCriminal LawPublic Policy
THE AI ANGLE
Generating nonconsensual explicit imagery from user promptsA Brown University study found that over 92 percent of statutes targeting nonconsensual intimate deepfakes penalize individual creators and distributors. These laws overlook the broader network of app stores, developer platforms, and payment systems that support the tools. Lawmakers and prosecutors face clear limits when relying on individual criminal liability instead of regulating this technical infrastructure.
THE TEACHING ANGLE
Classes can debate whether statutory liability should remain on individual offenders or expand to the platforms and payment processors that profit from the imagery.Read the original at techxplore.com Generate teaching or study materials
More in Law
- Teenager who planned terror attack in Sydney tells court he was radicalised online and used AI to strategiseThe Guardian — AI · November 10, 2026
- Q&A: How can organizations improve fairness in automated AI systems?Phys.org — Technology · November 10, 2026
- 'We want data centers in Norway, but we can’t have all types of data centers': Norwegian government halts new grid connections as it looks to limit AI facility construction until late 2027TechRadar · November 10, 2026
- Data centers need power—lower-income rural residents pay the pricePhys.org — Technology · November 10, 2026
- Australia considers criminal penalties for rogue AI in wake of OpenAI hackBBC — Technology · November 10, 2026