2 in 3 Harvard Professors Say AI Has a Negative Impact on Class
Higher EducationCurriculum & Instruction
THE AI ANGLE
Impacting course quality and generating unauthorized student submissionsA survey of more than 460 Harvard Arts and Sciences faculty revealed that nearly two-thirds believe artificial intelligence has had a negative impact on their courses, up significantly from the previous year. While university leadership encourages embracing AI in writing, research, and project-based coursework, most professors have enacted restrictive classroom policies, with a quarter banning it completely. This growing skepticism highlights a critical curriculum and policy divide between institutional adoption goals and instructional realities.
THE TEACHING ANGLE
Faculty must grapple with setting clear assignment parameters as nearly 90 percent report receiving AI-generated student work, despite only 64 percent feeling confident in their ability to distinguish it from authentic student submissions.Read the original at insidehighered.com Generate teaching or study materials
More in Higher Education
- How University IT Leaders Can Budget for Volatile AI Pricing ModelsEdTech Magazine — Higher Ed · September 17, 2026
- Big AI is trying to own the pathway to work. Universities shouldn’t play along | Ella HafermalzThe Guardian — Technology · September 17, 2026
- Reimagining Research Papers as Interactive and Reliable AI Agents (New Journal Article)LJ infoDOCKET · September 17, 2026
- Amendment 74: A.14 Atmosphere Research Program Due Date Delay and Clarification Regarding the use of Generative AINASA Science · September 17, 2026
- Presentation: Teaching Engineers, Trusting AI: How Education Enabled Autonomous Code ReviewInfoQ · September 16, 2026