Court Tells HHS To Stop Using AI To Cite Fake Studies, Or Willfully Misinterpret Others In Grant Solicitations
A federal district court issued a preliminary injunction halting the Department of Health and Human Services' effort to restrict Teen Pregnancy Prevention grants exclusively to abstinence-based programs, finding the policy changes likely arbitrary and capricious. The court observed that HHS supported its revised criteria by citing public health studies that were either fabricated or completely mischaracterized, exhibiting classic hallmarks of AI-generated citations. For faculty in law, health administration, and public policy, the case demonstrates the critical administrative and legal risks that arise when government agencies rely on unverified, hallucinated evidence to rewrite congressionally funded health programs.
Read the original at abovethelaw.com Generate teaching or study materials
More in Law
- Europe must build own AI or risk getting cut off by US or China, says ECB’s LagardeThe Guardian — AI · September 15, 2026
- Ex-FTC boss Khan urges Uncle Sam to break out the handcuffs for AI CEOs, citing 1934 precedentThe Register · September 15, 2026
- Open weights are not open source: Why AI's favorite label is under disputeThe Register · September 15, 2026
- AI, Redistribution, and the Size of the PieMarginal Revolution · September 15, 2026
- Using AI for Weapons DevelopmentSchneier on Security · September 15, 2026